





South Korea 2011

Lahore Pakistan 2011
PRACTICE PEACE - IN THOUGHT, WORD, AND DEED. This blog supports Peace, Personal Growth, The Energy of Love, civil liberties, human rights, good government, journalists and journalism, public libraries, and a vegan lifestyle. I am grateful for my health, employment, a warm home, indoor plumbing, and a new day.








House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced on Friday that he was spearheading a process that will, ultimately, witness the House of Representatives taking over the legal responsibilities of arguing for the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.I can't understand why this man and those who agree with him are so afraid. What harm will come to them if gay and lesbian couples are allowed to marry? What harm? His actions actively HURT and DISCRIMINATE AGAINST other human beings, while other people's marriage affects him NOT A WHIT. I just don't understand. Why is he not outlawing divorce? Heterosexuals getting a divorce hurts him just the same as gays and lesbians getting married - if that's his argument. There are plenty more heterosexuals getting a divorce than gays and lesbians getting married; the negative impact on his view of the sanctity of marriage is more harmed by heterosexual divorce.
The announcement comes less than two weeks after the Obama administration's Department of Justice removed itself from the case, declaring that it had determined the law -- which dictates that the federal government can only recognize a state-sanctioned marriage between a man and a woman -- to be unconstitutional.
The court's decision today, properly and respectfully acknowledged the Snyder family's grief. But, it also, correctly held that the response to that grief cannot include abandoning core first amendment principles that protect even the most unpopular speech.
Usually before the sun comes up, I offer myself to somthing greater than myself. If it's for one minute, or ten minutes, or twenty seconds, I at least stop in that space in my house every morning. I have a little meditation space where I just go. I have beautiful spiritual readings there, I light my three candles there, daily word, or something. And I express to this greater energy field than I that I don't want to be alone as I move out into the world.I appreciate her intention to offer herself to something greater than herself, and not wanting to be alone in the world.
I copied this from The Rachel Maddow Show blog.
For the record, I say "Power to the Protestors". Mubarek will not resign. He wants the protestors to go home because the Egyptian economy can't handle this unrest for very long. The argument bothers me to no end. If the Egyptian economy can't handle the unrest, and it matters to Mubarek, then he will resign. He shouldn't pretend he cares about the Egyptian economy; he's trying to define the story so it seems the protestors are the disruptors. It's sad that all over the world - in the USA, Egypt, Germany, Argentina, and everywhere humans are in charge - many of us can be convinced by the prospect of a disturbance to what we've gotten used to - even when what we've gotten used to isn't in our best interest.
While I'm hoping the protests will continue until Mubarek leaves, I support the United States staying out of this as much as possible. I'll change my mind if an overwhelming military force starts killing protestors. It seems unlikely at this point, but it also seemed unlikely that Mubarek would reassert his position in a speech today.
UPDATE 2/11/2011 - And there he goes...Mubarek is no longer the President of Egypt and a peaceful regime change has taken place in the Middle East. A model for the future? Let's hope so!
While there are other items that might ultimately be worthy of the Senate's attention, we cannot agree to prioritize any matters above the critical issues of funding the government and preventing a job-killing tax hike.




