Thursday, April 30, 2009

Lost - The Variable



Spoilers ahead.

Hmmm...good episode.

1. Daniel Faraday is the son of Charles Widmore and Eloise.
2. Jack is an idiot. Sawyer says he's not going to do anything until Daniel Faraday tells him what's going on and Jack says naw, don't worry about it. I'll do anything now and you can explain it to me later. Except - oops - now you're dead.
3. Jack is a raging idiot. I can't help it - I'm saying it again. He drives me crazy.
4. So, Daniel Faraday wants to make it so the crash never happened? Locke is a parapalegic again, Kate's on her way to jail, Rose has an incurable disease, Sun and Jin are estranged, etc, etc, etc. What a stupid rotten idea.
5. I'm thinking Charles Widmore is a good guy.
6. There's a difference between people who are caught up in the 'battle' and people who are born to the 'battle'. Jack is the son of Christian who has some role to play here so he's born to the 'battle'. Kate is an unwitting victim who is caught up in the 'battle'. I don't know if that's true or not. Maybe everyone has been caught up in this 'battle' unwittingly. Maybe its not even Christian - he's just an image.

See here for a recap.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Barack Obama and Joe Biden - the first 100 days


I approve.
I know he's not perfect and I'm not 100% convinced that every single choice he's made is the right one, but I continue to support his leadership 100%. I'm proud of him. From where I sit, he's made a positive change in America. He's honest. He's clearly making some tough decisions. I like him! And Michelle too! Very proud and happy to have Barack Obama as President of the United States of America.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Scrubs


The news that Scrubs may extend another year...gives me a bad feeling. I don't like it. The show hasn't been the same since it won the Emmy for best Comedy several years ago. There are still laughs to be had as they wind down this year, but please - let it go. I wouldn't say anything except I'm still on the side of the line that has good feelings about the show. One more year and it might put me over to the other side so that my feelings about the show are negative. I don't want that.

"Chuck" season 2 finale




Last night's season finale was a winner. Good show!
I liked every part of it: the beginning, the quick pace, the middle, the relationships, everybody's resolution, and the interesting end.
Good, good, good. Fun, fun, fun.

For a really glowing tribute read Alan Sepinwall's blog, What Alan's Watching
Also, Mo Ryan's blog, The Watcher has a review and links to more.

Gulp, part III


Root canal procedure: unhealthy tooth, drilling, filing with endofile, rubber filling and crown

Root canal appointment #2 tomorrow morning.
I can't even talk about it.
Eek!
And this swine flu drama isn't helping either.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Please sneeze into your sleeve!



Lots of talk of a flu pandemic .
Ugh.

Imgaine the germs you sneeze or cough into your hand appearing on everything you touch. Everything. Now, imagine all the strangers around you who do the same thing. Icky. Scary. That should be enough to make you stop sneezing or coughing into your hands, or even kleenex. Please.

Sneezing or coughing into the elbow is the best solution - hands stay clean, germs are less likely to spread through touching.

Now about this possible flu pandemic...
I know some people enjoy thinking about the worst possible outcomes, and, in most cases, I resiste the impulse to respond. But, for some reason flu pandemics really scare me. Our whole society could be affected by a widespread flu outbreak. I can imagine our way of life changing dramatically.
I was worried about the possible Avian flu a couple years ago. Now this.
My worry is that there are too many Americans who believe in pushing through their illnesses, and they'll infect everyone.
Stay home, please.
Anyway - the point is, flu pandemic scenarios scare me. I am vulnerable to the fear. I know these people are alarmists and assume the worst all the time - I shouldn't listen. I should ignore all the talk and hope for the best for everyone. I will try to stay calm.
(Though I'm tempted to get more bottled water, rice and beans, batteries, and toilet paper.)

Sigh.

And, just because we may not have a flu pandemic doesn't invalidate the good advice to sneeze into your sleeve! Please!

UPDATE: Here's the last bit of an article in the New York Times by Susan Dominus with a little perspective.
The prospect of a flu pandemic could make anyone nostalgic for the good old days when our biggest worries were rising gas prices and China’s seemingly unstoppable growth. Actually, a book like “Preparing for Pandemic Avian Flu” could make anyone nostalgic for the good old days when our biggest worries were a global financial meltdown, high unemployment and entire neighborhoods inhabited by squatters.

For those inclined to big-picture angst, the weather hasn’t helped. By Sunday, it was hot enough to raise inevitable questions of global warming. Would rising sea levels and widespread flooding soon enough make us all nostalgic for the good old days when all we had to worry about was swine flu?

You know what I really miss? Y2K.

Morning thoughts...



Images from Corbis


Last Wednesday morning I woke up with these three thoughts:

*****

If there are no angels within sight or sound, it is you.
Act accordingly.

*****

You're doing the best you can.
I'm doing the best I can.
If this is the result, I'm willing to live with it.

*****

How can we stand together...to fight this mighty foe?
How can we stand together...to make this change?

Bea Arthur


Thank you Bea Arthur for portraying strong women in television; Maude and Dorothy.
I imagine you must have been a strong woman in your private life as well because people often used your tall stature and deep voice as a punch line about femininity.
I grew up watching Maude and learned that I wanted to be a strong, outspoken woman. Of all the Golden Girls, I would choose to be Dorothy.
I learned from Bea Arthur, Maude, and Dorothy that its important to be true to who you are; embrace your YOU. Beyond everything.
And years later, I'm still trying.
For more on Bea Arthur (who also had a wonderful stage career)...
Washington Post
Entertainment Weekly
Ken Tucker on EW.com

Friday, April 24, 2009

What do these people have in common?





They all look like me, of course!
Truthfully, I look like no celebrity at all. Except, this is what I've been told...

When I was about 10, the dental assistant at my orthodonist said my eyes looked like Elizabeth Taylor's. I bet she was trying to make me feel better before a particularly nasty appointment. But, I believed her at the time. When I was younger my eyes were more blue and that might be what she was referring to.

One friend said I look like Rachel Dratch.

I've described myself as a Paula Poundstone type (kind of normal and nondescript).

But, the one I've been described as not once, but TWICE, is Jay Leno.
I played second base on a work softball team about 15 years ago. A grounder bumped off the lip of the dirt infield/grass outfield right into my chin, which grew about three sizes. (The crowd said "Ohhhhhh") As we were leaving one of the competitors said I looked like Jay Leno.

Recently, I've let my hair go gray (live life's experience, I say). When I pull my hair back in a ponytail, the gray becomes more pronounced on the top. I guess I could have been compared to a skunk, but a neighbor said I was a 'reverse' Jay Leno.

HA!

*****

One day I was watching a favorite HGTV show at the time called The World's Most Extreme Houses. They visited the African home of Dutch artist Daphnee Prevoo. She looks EX ACT LY like me. I thought I was looking at a mirror. It was shocking and exciting to see how much I looked like her. I think she even had similar mannerisms to me. It was wild. I showed it to a friend and my mother. They weren't quite as stunned as I was, but did acknowledge a resemblance. I kept the show on my TIVO for over a year. I've looked on the internet for a picture of her, but no luck. She has a website, but it only shows her art.

As an adoped person who's never seen anyone who looks like me - it was quite interesting and strange to see someone I thought was so similar to me.

Life is strange and funny, isn't it?

Thursday, April 23, 2009

My commitment to you, dear reader...


I haven't written very much in the last few days. I don't think that's the way to maintain a blog. I commit, here and now, to write something at least twice a week - Sunday and Thursday.

I have a couple topics to write about, but in the evenings I've felt like doing other things. See the picture above. I used a Tsukineko Memento ink pad (no smear with alcohol markers, Tuxedo Black), an Outlines rubber stamp, Copic markers (alcohol markers used by Manga artists), and a Copic marker pad (no bleed). I took a picture with my Canon G7 and modified the white paper from yellowish to more white with Adobe Photoshop Elements 6 (I think my camera's white balance needs to be adjusted).

Up close, as in the picture, flaws are a little more noticeable. It looks better in real life, trust me.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

President Obama's economic speech at Georgetown University on April 16, 2009



The President's economic speech at Georgetown University on April 16: See the text here. And an introductory blog entry by Gerald F Seib at the Wall Street Journal, here.
Its a good speech designed to define the plan's separate pieces and then how they all fit together to create a cohesive overall plan that will slowly but surely change direction in the country. I only hope nobody puts a monkey wrench in the plan because it seems like it all has to fit together in order to work. With any part of it gutted by whiny Republicans in congress, or the progressive left trying to get more than is practical (even though I support them!) I would worry about its success.

Your best bet is to read the full text or watch the video, but if you want...following is my summary of the speech. I enjoyed reading it slowly and taking notes because it helps stick in my head that way. Its a pretty darn good speech I'd say.

Obama lays out his vision...
I want every American to know that each action we take and each policy we pursue is driven by a larger vision of America's future - a future where sustained economic growth creates good jobs and rising incomes; a future where prosperity is fueled not by excessive debt, or reckless speculation, or fleeting profits, but is instead built by skilled, productive workers, by sound investments that will spread opportunity at home and allow this nation to lead the world in technologies and innovation and discoveries that will shap the 21st century. That's the America I see. ... That is the future that I know that we can have.


Obama lays out how we got here...
lenders and investment banks wanted to make quick profits, people believed they could buy houses their incomes did not support, credit agencies gave a rubber stamp approval to securities they didn't understand and couldn't quantify. Investors and banks passed off risks to others and believed the housing market would never bust. Even companies that were considered conservative, safe, and secure - AIG, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac - wanted in on the action. Little, if any, accountability from Washington or Wall Street. The housing bubble burst - oh! home prices really DO go down.
Greed gave way to fear. Investors pulled their money out of the market. Large financial institutions that didn't have enough money on hand to pay off all their obligations collapsed. Other banks held on tight to their money and simply stopped lending.
Now, this is when the crisis spread from Wall Street to Main Street. After all, the ability to get a loan is how you finance the purchase of everything from a home to a car to a...college education. Its how stores stock their shelves, and farms buy equipment, and businesses make payroll. So when banks stopped lending money, businesses started laying off workers. When laid-off workers had less money to spend, businesses were forced to lay off even more workers. When people couldn't get a car loan, a bad situation at the auto companies became even worse. When people couldn't get home loans, the crisis in the housing market only deepened. Because the infected securities were being traded worldwide and other nations also had weak regulations, this recession soon became global. And when other nations can't afford to buy goods, it slows our economy even further.
So this is the situation, the downard spiral that we confronted on the day that we took office. So our most urgent task has been to clear away the wreckage, repair the immediate damage to the economy, and do everything we can to prevent a larger collapse. And since the problems we face are all working off each other to feed a vicious economic downturn, we've had no choice but to attack all our fronts of our economic crisis simultaneously.


Obama lays out the steps he's taking...
Step 1 - fight a severe shorgage of demand in the economy by lowering interest rates (Federal Reserve), pass the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act which includes a tax cut, extend unemployment benefits and continued health care for Americans who have lost their job through no fault of their own.
Argument against Step 1 - this is irresponsible spending and the federal government should be cutting instead of increasing spending right now. What about our long-term deficit?
Counter argument for Step 1 - if everybody - every business and family in America - curtails spending and cuts back all at once, "then no one is spending any money, which means there are no customers, which means there are more layoffs, which means the economy gets even worse." The recovery plan represents a tiny fraction of the long-term deficit. "As I'll discuss in a moment, the key to dealing with our long-term deficit and our national debit is to get a handle on out-of-control health care costs - not to stand idly by as the economy goes into free fall."

Step 2 - "heal our financial system so that crdit is once again flowing to the businesses and families who rely on it." Continue TARP. "We must provide banks with the capital and the confidence necessary to start lending again." Stress Tests on banks to determine how much additional capital will be needed to support lending at our largest banks. When we give money to banks "we will hold accountable those who are responsible, we'll force the necessary adjustments, we'll provide the support to clean up those bank balance sheets...". Pair government resources with private investment in order to clear away the old loans and securities that are also preventing banks from lending money. Increase guarantees for small business loans, unlock the market for auto loans and student loans. Stabilize the housing market with a foreclosure/refinance plan. Work with the auto industry.
Argument(s) against step 2 - a) the government should let the banks fail since it was their bad decisions that helped create the crisis in the first place. b) Give the money directly to the people and the businesses instead of the banks. c) nationalize the banks already! Do like the FDIC does with smaller banks. Why aren't you tougher on banks?
Counter argument(s) for Step 2 - a) history shows us that if you don't take early and aggressive action to get credit flowing again, the crisis will last years and years instead of months and months. b) "a dollar of capital in a bank can actually result in $8 or $10 of loans to families and business. So, that's a multiplier effect that can ultimately lead to a faster pace of economic growth." c) "we believe that preemptive government takeovers are likely to end up costing taxpayers even more in the end, and because its more likely to undermine thatn create confidence."
A note from me: Its important to quickly get credit flowing again IF you want to live in an economy based almost exclusively on credit. It seems to me we might want some businesses and purchases to be credit based, but our lifestyle should not be built on it.

Step 3 - Coordinate a global response to the global recession. Go to the G20 summit in London. All countries agreed to toughen regulatory reforms, triple the lending capacity of the Internation Monetary Fund, pledged to avoid trade barriers and protectionsism, and plan to meet again.

So that's where we've been, that's what we've done in the last three mnths. All of these actions - the Recovery Act, the bank capitalization program, the housing plan, the strengthening of the non-bank credit market, the auto plan, and our work at the G20 - all have been necessary pieces of the recovery puzzle. They've been designed to increase aggregate demand to get credit flowing again to families and businesses and to help families and bsinesses ride out the storm. And taken together, these actions are starting to generate signs of economic progress.


...

2009 will continue to be a difficult year for American's economy, and obviously, most difficult for those who've lost their jobs. The severity of this recession will cause more job loss, more foreclosres, and more pain before it ends. The market will continue to rise and fall. Credit is still not lowing nearly as easily as it should. The process for restructuring AIG and the auto companies will involve difficult and sometimes unpopular choices; we are not finished yet on that front. And all of this means that there's much more work to be done. But all of this also means that you can continue to expect an unrelenting, unyielding, day-by-day effort from this administration to fight for economic recovery on all fronts.


Obama lays out his plan for the future...
Make sure this type of crisis never happens again. Rebuild our economic house on a solid foundation.
a) work with congress to create new rules for Wall Street that reward drive an innovation, not reckless risk-taking, create a regulatory framework for banks, lenders, etc.
b) investment in education that will make our workforce more skilled and competitive, expand early childhood education, innovative education programs help schools meeting high standards and close achievement gaps, review teacher compensation, every American should commit to at least one year or more of higher education or career training, tax credits for college education, develop more scientists and engineers.
c) invest in renewable energy and technology to create new jobs and new industries, the Recovery Act has some investment in renewable energy, market-based cap on carbon pollution.
d) investment in health care to cut costs for families and business, Recovery Act has investment in electronic health records, invest in preventative care, in the current budget just passed there a commitment to reform health care - work with Congress to make that happen.
e) restore fiscal discipline in the federal budget - procurement reform to greatly reduce no-bid contracts, waste and cost overruns in the defense budget (announced by Secretary Gates), end education programs that don't work, root out waste and fraud and abuse in Medicare, go through federal budget line by line.

These are the 'five pillars' "...that will grow our economy and make this new century another American century."

I know there is a criticism out there that my administration has somehow been spending with reckless abandon, pushing a liberal social agenda while mortgaging our children's future.

Well let me make three points.

First, as I said earlier, the worst thing that we could do in a recession this severe is to try to cut government spending at the same time as families and businesses around the world are cutting back on their spending. So as serious as our deficit and debt problems are - and they are very serious - major efforts to deal with them have to focus on the medium and long-term budget picture.

Second, in tackling the deficit issue, we simply cannot sacrifice the long-term investments that we so desperately need to generate long-term prosperity. Just as a cash-strapped family may cut back on luxuries but will insist on spending money to get their children through college, so we as a country have to make current choices with an eye on the future. If we don't invest now in renewable energy or a skilled workforce or a more affordable health care system, this economy simply won't grow at the pace it needs to in two or five or ten years down the road. If we don't lay this new foundation, it won't be long before we are right back where we are today. And I can assure you that chronically slow growth will not help our long-term budget situation.

Third, the problem with our deficit and debt is not new. It has been building dramatically over the past eight years, largely because big tax cuts combined with increased spending on two wars and the increased costs of government health care programs. This structural gap in our budget, between the amount of money coming in and the amount going out, will only get worse as Baby Boomers age, and will in fact lead us down an unsustainable path. But let's not kid ourselves and suggest that we can do it by trimming a few earmarks or cutting the budget for the National Endowment for the Arts. Along with defense and interest on the national debt, the biggest costs in our budget are entitlement programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security that get more and more expensive every year. So if we want to get serious about fiscal discipline - and I do - then we are going to not only have to trim waste out of our discretionary budget, a process we have already begun - but we will also have to get serious about entitlement reform.

Nothing will be more important to this goal than passing health care reform that brings down costs across the system, including in Medicare and Medicaid. Make no mistake: health care reform is entitlement reform. That's not just my opinion - that was the conclusion of a wide range of participants at the Fiscal Responsibility Summit we held at the White House in February, and that's one of the reasons why I firmly believe we need to get health care reform done this year.


And the end of the speech is really quite good as well...

All of these efforts will require tough choices and compromises. But the difficulties can't serve as an excuse for inaction. Not anymore.

This brings up one final point I'd like to make today. I've talked a lot about the fundamental weakness in our economy that led us to this day of reckoning. But we also arrived here because of a fundamental weakness in our political system.

For too long, too many in Washington put off hard decisions for some other time on some other day. There's been a tendency to score political points instead of rolling up sleeves to solve real problems. There is also an impatience that characterizes this town - an attention span that has only grown shorter with the twenty-four hour news cycle, and insists on instant gratification in the form of immediate results or higher poll numbers. When a crisis hits, there's all too often a lurch from shock to trance, with everyone responding to the tempest of the moment until the furor has died away and the media coverage has moved on, instead of confronting the major challenges that will shape our future in a sustained and focused way.

This can't be one of those times. The challenges are too great. The stakes are too high. I know how difficult it is for Members of Congress in both parties to grapple with some of the big decisions we face right now. It's more than most congresses and most presidents have to deal with in a lifetime.

But we have been called to govern in extraordinary times. And that requires an extraordinary sense of responsibility - to ourselves, to the men and women who sent us here, and to the many generations whose lives will be affected for good or for ill because of what we do here.

There is no doubt that times are still tough. By no means are we out of the woods just yet. But from where we stand, for the very first time, we are beginning to see glimmers of hope. And beyond that, way off in the distance, we can see a vision of an America's future that is far different than our troubled economic past. It's an America teeming with new industry and commerce; humming with new energy and discoveries that light the world once more. A place where anyone from anywhere with a good idea or the will to work can live the dream they've heard so much about.

It is that house upon the rock. Proud, sturdy, and unwavering in the face of the greatest storm. We will not finish it in one year or even many, but if we use this moment to lay that new foundation; if we come together and begin the hard work of rebuilding; if we persist and persevere against the disappointments and setbacks that will surely lie ahead, then I have no doubt that this house will stand and the dream of our founders will live on in our time. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

Current Events Roundup...



This is going to be longer than I'd like because I haven't written much in the last weeks. And, the picture doesn't match anything, but I'm getting used to the idea of having an image with each entry and I wasn't sure what to use for this one. So, its a pretty picture that makes me feel summery and free. The picture comes from .littlegirlblue's photostream
(am I allowed to use the picture just 'cause?)

And now...on to current events!


A word to protestors: If you're going to protest, have a coherent argument that makes sense to rational people. Spewing hatred, vulgarity, and buzzwords designed by propogandists to foment fear do nothing to help your cause. I stopped listening when I realized you don't want me to understand and be persuaded by your argument. You want me to join you out of fear and anger and mistrust.
Until you have the confidence that the merits of your argument are enough to persuade me, and until you speak to me with the respect your argument deserves, I will not be bothered by listening to you.
I wish everyone would agree with me on that.

Torture memos: While I agree with the sentiment of Keith Olbermann's special comment, I'm not upset that the Obama administration isn't going to prosecture people.
First, I'm not clear that the administration is saying that we won't prosecute the policy makers and people like that. I got the impression they were only absolving the people who actually performed the acts (and ya gotta wonder how their souls are faring). I could be wrong.
Second, tit for tat, tit for tat. I'm sick of it. Somebody's gotta stop or we'll spend the next decades of our lives squabbling about things that took place generations ago with no end in sight - only because we feel we need to punish.
Third, we're in the middle of another crisis and we need to stay focused on the domestic and international issues we can control from today forward. The right thing to do is put measures in place that make this impossible to happen again and carry on with getting ourselves out of the situation. Is there a statute of limitations on these crimes? Can we do something about it later when we're not in crisis?
Its a heart-wrenching decision because our country has been scarred by the Bush administration, but we need to stay focused. I think surviving today and thriving tomorrow are more important than punishing the mistakes of the past. As long as we agree they ARE mistakes and they ARE in the past!

President Obama in South America: Wow. Some of those South American countries are mad. They know Obama is willing to take it on the chin for a little while about the past misdeeds of the United States, so they're piling on. I think Obama will take it, stay calm, smile. The leaders of the countries (Chavez, Noriega et al) will think they've won him over; showed him to be a weak man. And then, they'll think they want to test him again. And Obama will show them he is not a pushover. The United States will accept blame for past mistakes, but will NOT be a party to any more of their gamesmanship. We really are a strong country and if we stay true to the principles I believe our country stands for (honesty, truth, freedom, and democracy) then we won't be standing up for thugs, tyrants, corruption, and brutality. We won't be turning a blind eye to things we don't believe in just to serve a short term national interest, or a corporate machine. I think its a tall order, but its what I believe Obama is striving for.
So, South American leaders who hate us, go ahead and have your say. We accept what is rightfully ours. But, watch where you go. We are not about to fall off a cliff for you.

Pirates and Drug Wars: Criminals. Economic injustice. Somalia. Mexico. At least they're not religious idealogues. Its all about money and power.
Given that many of the criminals around the world are born into an environment in which a criminal lifestyle is the norm, I don't feel comfortable 'blaming' the low level pirates and drug people They're trying to make a buck and feed a family. Maybe. But, what about the leader guy who has managed to have a lot of money (I assume the leader lives in a fancy house on a hill, like in the movies)? He knows his money could make a difference in his community - change the equation for a lot of people. He could stop and move on in a new direction. But at that point, when its no longer about money, its about power. Anyone who can get to the top of a criminal organization isn't going to give up power. Those are the ones I blame.
And, in terms of drugs, I also blame the users. But, that's a whole other story.

As far as the hero captain of the Maersk? I applaud him and his sacrifice. But, I caution the media lionizing him. We're so desperate for some bit of 'good' news related to fighting other people and not getting pushed around that we may be taking this a bit too far. And yet, I don't begrudge him his moment in the sun. The mainstream media has a history of twisting and turning a story until it fits their own narrative. In this case its: See? The United States WILL kick your ass!!

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Oh Happy Day!



I finally found a chain for glasses! I've been looking and looking (okay - not too hard, but I kept it in mind). Just a couple weeks ago I found what the package called a "glasses thong" (top picture). But, it only hooked on one side of the glasses. It flops around too much and doesn't always hold the glasses when they're open. Today, out of the blue, I found the kind that go on both sides! (bottom picture) Yay! Only 5.00 at Fred Meyer's.
Now I can be the proper, aging, librarian-type (presumed to be brainy) lady I've always wanted to be!!!

Lost: "Some Like it Hoth"


Do you know what lies in the shadow of the statue? Love that.
We have the original inhabitants of the island who know what lies in the shadow of the statue (at least, my theory is that they're original inhabitants from way way way way back), then we have the Richard Alpert group that may or may not be part of the original inhabitants (contemporary with them? Maybe there was an original split in the ancient past that is still reverberating years and years and years later and no one even knows why they're fighting anymore.) Next there's the Dharma people who don't know the full extent of the story - more like 'civilization' trying to take advantage of native technologies and resources. Widmore is siding with some of the original inhabitants, but not the 'off island' ones. Is he with Richard Alpert? And Ben is a pawn in the larger battle. As Locke will be, unless he figures things out and the Oceanic group ends the ancient war. Wow - lots of speculation. I don't remember enough of the details to know if that theory is even possible.

Good episode. Miles becomes more than a quip.
This came from the recap on TVGuide...
"You're playing for the wrong team," Bram says. "What team are you playing for?" Miles asks. "The one that's going to win," Bram replies, which speaks directly to Widmore's assertion that there's going to be a war on the island, and that, without Locke, the wrong side is going to win. Any thoughts on who the sides are — and which side we're rooting for at this point? I need to know which team colors to wear before the next pep rally.

Yeah - I don't know which side to be on!!

My favorite dialoge of the night was when Miles is driving the van out to Radzinsky. Radzinsky stops him and asks what he's doing there. Miles says:
"LeFleur's busy.
Horace sent me instead.
I'm in the Circle of Trust."

HA HA! That Circle of Trust is pretty funny. It makes the Dharma people seem like kids in junior high who think they're really cool. Funny.

The Dharma initiative seems a little odd to me (well, apart from the obvious elements that prove they ARE wierd). Its a pretty small community and yet when one of their kids goes missing, most of the people don't have any idea or change their routine at all. Contrast that with the old westerns we used to watch. Those stories took place in small towns where everyone knew they were dependent on only themselves and when something happened, the whole town became involved in one way or another. Not in Dharmaville, I guess. Are the residents of Dharmaville being kept out of the loop about the "Hostiles"? That doesn't make sense because they have some alert system they're all aware of. Are they all cold-blooded criminal types? I mean, really, who would allow themselves to be drugged to board a sub to go to work? And then keep their mouths shut. Strange. And why is Horace in charge? He doesn't seem like he has the right peronality traits for leadership if the person who started Dharmaville really wanted it to be a serious business venture.

Anyway - lots of stuff I don't get. I'm not savvy enough to know if what I don't understand is key to the story; a clue to the puzzle, or careless writing/plotting/planning on the part of production - or something they had to do to serve the story and even if its not ideal, it has to be done. like putting Horace in charge, or making Dharmaville strange, or people doing clearly stupid things like keeping their mouths shut when they know they should say something.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Lost "Dead is Dead"


Another good episode of Lost. This season, I watch the episode on Wednesday evening and delete it from TIVO right away. I want to savor it again when the DVD's come out (not until December 2009 I understand). I'v enjoyed this season a lot.
Last night's episode was fun because, as a fan of Locke, I liked that he led Ben around. HA! Take THAT you rulebreaker, you!
Both Ben and Widmore broke rules, but only Ben can get back and forth to the island. ? Hmmm. Widmore was part of the Others before Ben.
What does Jacob want? I think Richard Alpert must be the 'priest' of the group or something. That's why he doesn't strictly follow anyone's rules.
There must be an original tribe, and as people become shipwrecked or somehow attached to the island like the Dharma Initiative, some of them become Others.
Ilana's scene last night was very creepy. I think she must be one of the original island members coming home again. Either by her own manipulations or taking advantage of someone else's. She's trying to figure out who is a real tribe member after all these years and who are 'pretenders'. The question about the statue is a code to help her know who is original and who isn't.
It was suggested in a forum that she might be Egyptian. That could go along with my 'original tribe' idea.
I don't want to get into too many details. Not as much fun. Just enjoy the story.

Monday, April 6, 2009

Gulp, part II


Receoved a phone call this morning from my new dentist office. The dentist who's doing my root canal has an opening tomorrow at 9:00 am - do I want it? Eek! Its one week early and I'm not sure I can be emotionally prepared so quickly. I decided it would be nice to get it over with. So, one week after my tooth extraction, I'm going back for the first of two root canal appointments tomorrow morning for tooth #18. #17 is a wisdom tooth, which I had removed when I was 16.

Breathe deep, Calm Body/Alert Mind, I choose to take care of my teeth.

Saturday, April 4, 2009

North Korea



North Korea launches rocket

I'm struggling with my feelings of anger and disgust for the North Korean government and everyone who supports it. I want to be peaceful.
I don't understand how to deal with a country that lives in an alternate reality. They enter into agreements and break them and blame everyone else and enter into more agreements and break them. I feel like we're the crazy ones to continue expecting them to abide by any agreement. This was one area where I was kind of on board with George Bush's plan - the US shouldn't talk to North Korea bilaterally, it has to be a regional conversation with China involved.

I'm frustrated as well, with commenters on the Internet. I'd like to read what other people think about this problem, but all I read are strange, bitter, mean, and nasty partisan attacks on Barack Obama and liberals.

Those people are just as crazy as I think Kim Jong Il is.

Miss Universe 2008 and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba



This is taken from The Lede, a New York Times blog by Robert Mackey

The only image I could think of that would be an expression of my feelings is the screaming lady (I've used her before - maybe she'll be my logo). She represents my disbelief and terror that I live in such a strange world.
For contast, I also include a picture of Dayana Mendoza of Venezuela, Miss Universe 2008

I'm copying the blog entry from the the Lede in its entirety because it contains the full text of Miss Universe's blog entry about her trip to Guantanamo.

But, why does this fill me with disbelief and wonder?
[I have spent the better part of an hour trying to articulate why this makes no sense to me.] There are two worlds. The public and the private. If we all know the public world of Miss Universe is a put-on, then why would her reaction be newsworthy? Yes, her reaction to Guantanamo Bay was bizarre and inappropriate given its recent past, but why would Robert Mackey expect her to understand that? Maybe he expected her handlers to understand it? The USO?
I've always had trouble with these duplicitous (marked by deliberate deceptiveness especially by pretending one set of feelings and acting under the influence of another) systems. It seems to me you have to be clear about how you're judging them - by their public or private persona. In that case, though, if you know the public persona is false, why bother making a case that Miss Universe doesn't understand the issues at Guantanamo Bay? Why not just go for the Miss Universe Organization itself and its hypocrisy?
Or, am I being the Miss Universe contestant here? Am I not getting something?
Maybe the only thing to 'get' is that we live in a bizarre world.


Miss Universe Visits Guantánamo Bay
By Robert Mackey
Updated | March 31 Don’t ask us how or why we came across this — and the British home secretary’s husband did not bring it to our attention — but the latest entry on the blog of the reigning Miss Universe, Dayana Mendoza, has a sort of eye-catching dateline: “March 27, 2009, Guantánamo Bay.”

Venezuela’s Dayana Mendoza was crowned Miss Universe in July, 2008. According to the Web site of the U.S.O., which arranged the visit, the Miss Universe Organization made the decision to “deploy Crystle Stewart, Miss U.S.A. 2008, and Dayana Mendoza, Miss Universe 2008, to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, to visit troops as part of a U.S.O./Armed Forces Entertainment tour.”

Ms. Mendoza, who competed as Miss Venezuela, has a blog on the pageant’s Web site, and here’s what she wrote last Friday, after her deployment:

This week, Guantánamo!!! It was an incredible experience.

We arrived in Gitmo on Friday and stared going around the town, everybody knew Crystle and I were coming so the first thing we did was attend a big lunch and then we visited one of the bars they have in the base. We talked about Gitmo and what is was like living there. The next days we had a wonderful time, this truly was a memorable trip! We hung out with the guys from the East Coast and they showed us the boat inside and out, how they work and what they do, we took a ride around the land and it was a loooot of fun!

We also met the Military dogs, and they did a very nice demonstration of their skills. All the guys from the Army were amazing with us.

We visited the Detainees camps and we saw the jails, where they shower, how the recreate themselves with movies, classes of art, books. It was very interesting.


We took a ride with the Marines around the land to see the division of Gitmo and Cuba while they were informed us with a little bit of history.

The water in Guantánamo Bay is soooo beautiful! It was unbelievable, we were able to enjoy it for at least an hour. We went to the glass beach, and realized the name of it comes from the little pieces of broken glass from hundred of years ago. It is pretty to see all the colors shining with the sun. That day we met a beautiful lady named Rebeca who does wonders with the glasses from the beach. She creates jewelry with it and of course I bought a necklace from her that will remind me of Guantánamo Bay :)

I didn’t want to leave, it was such a relaxing place, so calm and beautiful.

That glowing account of Ms. Mendoza’s visit to the U.S. Naval Station at Guantánamo Bay is unlikely to please Hugo Chavez, her country’s president. Mr. Chavez, who reportedly called Ms. Mendoza to congratulate her when she won the Miss Universe crown last year, recently called on the United States to “return Guantánamo and Guantánamo Bay to the Cubans” after closing the detention facility there.

Mr. Chavez, who is close to the Cuban leadership, may now be rethinking the praise he heaped on Ms. Mendoza on Venezuelan television last year, when she returned to Caracas with the crown: [YouTube video here, which I'm not including]

Update: The Miss Universe Organization, which we had been unable to reach for comment on Monday, sent us a written statement (.pdf) on Ms. Mendoza’s visit, and blog post, late on Tuesday afternoon. The statement, which notes that Miss Universe is “An NBC Universal, Inc. and Donald J. Trump Partnership,” is from Paula Shugart, the organization’s president. It reads, in part:

Dayana Mendoza’s comments on her blog were in reference to the hospitality she received while meeting the members of the U.S. military and their families who are stationed in Guantánamo.

The Miss Universe Organization echoes the mission of the USO, which is to lift the spirits of U.S. troops and their families wherever they serve. We will continue to show our appreciation and express our gratitude to the military personnel who serve our nation.


*****

My Update:
GUANTANAMO BAY, Cuba, April 4 (UPI) -- The commander of the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, says Miss Universe and Miss USA visited the camp for the benefit of troops stationed there.

"They were on tour to say `hello and thank you' to the guard force," Navy Rear Adm. David M. Thomas Jr. told The Miami Herald.

Crystle Stewart, Miss USA, and Miss Universe, Dayana Mendoza, of Venezuela were at the camp from March 21 through March 24 on a trip arranged by the USO, which provides entertainment for the U.S. military. Critics said the camp violated the Geneva Conventions ban on allowing detainees to be an object of "public curiosity" by allowing the two beauty queens to see a prisoner compound.

Mendoza wrote about Guantanamo in her blog, describing the water in the bay as "sooo beautiful" and the camp as "very interesting."

Guards told the Herald the women were conservatively dressed and the detainees appeared not to notice them.

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Thoughts on tonight's television...



BETTER OFF TED - This one surprises me with a laugh periodically. Tonight's episode gave me a few laughs. When the lab guys shared a hazmat suit and one scratched his nose and the other adjusted his glasses, I laughed. The show has a specific sense of humor that can be funny. But, I'm cautious of it. I don't know why. I've got it on a Season Pass though.

LOST - a very satisfying episode. Why? Because the 'new' Jack is a Jack I like (even if Kate doesn't). Because Sawyer appreciates his relationship with Juliet. Because Kate is doing the right thing by coming back to the island to search for Claire (and thank goodness its not to save Sawyer).

LIFE ON MARS - I never watched this show until tonight (and only tonight because TIVO had the time for Lost mixed up.) I'm glad for the people who watched it that everything got wrapped up. There was a nice conclusion that seemed to wrap up the 1973 relationships, and the 'real' relationships. I thought it was interesting that even though I'd never seen the show, I had an understanding of the relationships pretty easily. And, I didn't watch it because I remember those cop shows from the 70's because I lived then. I was okay not seeing that style again.