The first one is not actually AI, but it's Automated Information and that starts with AI!!
1. Timers and reminders: On my television, on the lights in my house, on my Alexa.
Changed my life. No more waking up in the middle of the ight with the television and lights on. No more wet clothes in the washing machine because I forgot I was doing laundry. These small things make me so happy!!!
2. Copilot for Excel
I wanted to learn all the ins and outs of using Excel to create detailed spreadsheets. Alas, it takes way too long or I am a slooooow learner or the level of effort exceeds my patience and curiosity. Enter Copilot for Excel who created a big spreadsheet for me and didn't loudly sigh or get frustrated with me when I changed my mind. Yay
3. Claude
I've been having a lot of fun asking Claude random questions that come up in the course of a day. These are questions that I previously would have asked but would have no convenient way to answer so I never found out the answer. Claude answers right away. I now understand the history of locks to let boats pass from fresh water to sea water. And it turns out there are physiological changes in fish that allow them be born in fresh water, live in saltwater, and return to freshwater to die. You might have known, but I didn't. I;ve been learning a lot. FYI - it's not quite as helpful as a search agent. You have to keep an eye on it and be prepared to challenge things that don't quite make sense. For history, literature, social science etc - it's great!
Note: Here is Claude's version of my paragraph about Claude:
I've been having a lot of fun asking Claude the random questions that pop up over the course of a day. These are the kinds of questions I used to let go because there was no convenient way to answer them, so I never found out. Now Claude answers right away. I finally understand the history of locks that let boats pass between fresh water and sea water. I also learned that some fish undergo physiological changes that allow them to be born in fresh water, live in salt water, and return to fresh water to die. You may have known that, but I didn't, and I'm learning a lot.
One caveat: Claude isn't as reliable as a search agent for current or factual details. You have to keep an eye on it and be ready to challenge anything that doesn't quite make sense. For history, literature, social science, and similar subjects, though, it's great!
- The fish line is slightly too broad. Fish that live in both fresh and salt water are called anadromous. Pacific salmon fit your description, since they die after spawning. But steelhead and Atlantic salmon often survive and make the trip more than once. My edit added "some fish," which covers it, but your original read as if it applies to all of them.
- The caveat applies to your favorite subjects too. History, literature, and social science are areas where I can state a wrong date, misattribute a quote, or present a contested interpretation as settled. Those errors are easy to miss because the answer sounds plausible. So the "keep an eye on it" advice holds across the board, not just for current facts.
- The search-agent comparison depends on the setting. In this app I can run web searches, and when I do, I'm acting as a search agent. Without search, I'm answering from training, which is where the staleness and gaps come from.
I also changed your meaning in my edit. You wrote "not quite as helpful," and I swapped in "reliable... for current or factual details." That was my interpretation, not yours, so revert it if it doesn't match what you meant.
My main rebuttal is that your safeguard has a gap. You say to challenge things that don't quite make sense, but the answers most likely to mislead you are the ones that do make sense. I tend to sound fluent and confident whether I'm right or not, so a wrong detail about the fish or the locks would feel just as satisfying as a correct one.
Two related points:
- History, literature, and social science are areas where I tend to smooth things over. Historians and scholars often disagree, and I may hand you one clean narrative that hides the dispute. Since those are your strongest interests, it's worth asking me "where do scholars disagree on this?" now and then.
- I can lean toward your framing. If you come in with a theory, I may be too quick to build on it rather than push back. Asking me to argue the other side works well.
On the search-agent comparison, I'd say they do different jobs rather than one being more helpful. A search gives you sources you can check, and I give you quick synthesis and context. Using me to get oriented and then checking the claims you care about against a source is probably the strongest combination.
None of this undercuts your experience. Asking questions you would otherwise have dropped is a real benefit, and your habit of staying skeptical is the right one.




